The CFPB is facing pushback from the U.S. Senate over two final rules issued under the Biden administration: one expanding oversight of nonbank digital payment providers and another limiting the reporting of medical debt. Both efforts invoke the Congressional Review Act (CRA), a legislative mechanism that allows Congress to roll back recently finalized federal regulations.Continue Reading GOP Senators Moving to Invoke the Congressional Review Act Over Biden-Era Rules
In an order issued in January and made public on February 24, a judge in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted class certification to consumers alleging a fintech lender’s loan transaction fees were imposed unlawfully, while also granting summary judgment to the lender on claims regarding performance fees due to insufficient evidence.Continue Reading Class Action Certified Against Fintech Lender for Home Improvement Loans
On February 26, the FDIC withdrew its amicus brief in the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals challenging Colorado’s 2023 opt-out law which aimed to restricting higher-cost online lending. The FDIC’s decision follows a shift in the agency’s leadership and marks a departure from the previous administration’s position supporting Colorado’s interpretation of the Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act (DIDMCA).Continue Reading FDIC Withdraws Support for Colorado’s Opt-Out Law Before Tenth Circuit
On February 14, a divided Second Circuit panel upheld a 2016 jury verdict which found that a mortgage lender violated, among other laws, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (“ECOA”) by engaging in “reverse redlining” when it allegedly targeted Black and Latino homeowners with predatory loans.Continue Reading Second Circuit Upholds Reverse Redlining Verdict Against Mortgage Lender
On February 6, 2025, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals struck down the FCC’s one-to-one consent rule (previously discussed here). Applying the Supreme Court’s decision in Loper Bright Enters. v. Raimondo, the Eleventh Circuit ruled that the FCC exceeded its legal authority by enforcing additional consent restrictions not explicitly outlined in the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA).Continue Reading Eleventh Circuit Strikes Down One-to-One Consent Rule
On January 24, the FCC issued an order postponing the effective date of its one-to-one consent rule. The rule, which would have required companies to obtain individual consent for each marketing partner before sharing customer data, was originally slated to go into effect on January 27, 2025. However, the FCC’s order has put the rule on hold until at least January 26, 2026, unless a court ruling dictates an earlier implementation date.Continue Reading Delays Implementation of One-to-One Consent Rule
On December 18, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit heard arguments in Insurance Marketing Coalition Limited (“IMC”) v. Federal Communications Commission, which was brought by the marketing trade association to challenge the FCC’s December 2023 one-to-one consent rule, which is slated to go into effect on January 27, 2025. Under the new rule promulgated under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, the FCC has modified the definition of “express written consent” and seeks to require comparison shopping websites and other marketers to obtain a consumer’s prior written consent to receive calls and texts from one marketing partner at a time. Continue Reading Federal Court of Appeals Considers Challenge to FCC’s One-to-One Consent Rule
On November 26, the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals overturned sanctions imposed by the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) against a decentralized cryptocurrency mixing service (a blockchain-based technology used to enable transaction anonymity) accused of facilitating money laundering.Continue Reading Fifth Circuit Overturns OFAC Sanctions on Blockchain-based Privacy Technology
On August 21, a group of trade organizations filed an amicus brief in support of a motion to dismiss filed by a subprime auto lender that is the target of a joint enforcement action brought by the CFPB and the New York State Office of the Attorney General in the Southern District of New York. The underlying complaint alleges that the auto lender misrepresented costs in loan agreements and tricked customers into high-cost loans on used cars in violation of the CFPA and New York usury limits (see previous blog post here). In particular, the complaint alleges that: (1) the auto lender’s business model allegedly incentivizes vehicle dealers to inflate vehicle prices so that the true finance charges in the retail installment contracts that dealers originate are hidden from consumers; and (2) the lender fails to assess consumers’ ability to pay prior to extending credit. Continue Reading Amicus Brief Argues CFPB Overreached in Enforcement Action Against Auto Lender